Debunking Popular Vaping Myths (Again)

American Vapor Manufacturers Logo

There’s no polite way to say this: public health experts continue to lie to adult smokers about the benefits of vaping. Nicotine vapor products have been on the market for over two decades, and the evidence produced over that time has consistently shown that they are far safer than combustible tobacco.

But that’s not the message you’ll receive from agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Vapes “deliver harmful chemicals and contain nicotine, which is highly addictive,” FDA’s website declares. “Moreover, given the harmful chemicals found in e-cigarettes, further high-quality research on both short- and long-term health outcomes is needed.”

Each of those claims is false. And as long as myths like these are amplified by powerful government agencies, we need to swat them down to ensure that Americans have access to accurate information about vaping, a habit that could save millions of lives. Let’s take FDA’s claims one at a time.

Myth 1: Nicotine Vaping Delivers “Harmful Chemicals”

Reality: While nicotine is a stimulant, found in both cigarettes and vaping products, the way it is delivered to the body is significantly different. Cigarettes burn tobacco, releasing thousands of toxins and at least 70 carcinogens, while vaping involves heating a nicotine-containing liquid, producing an aerosol that is far less toxic. Studies have shown that nicotine vaping is at least 95% less toxic than smoking cigarettes, and there has been no evidence of a causal link between vaping and any disease.

Simply put: the dose makes the poison. There are far fewer chemicals in nicotine vapor. The remaining chemicals that are present in vapor are there in much lower amounts than those found in tobacco smoke. As an agency staffed by scientists, FDA is well aware of these facts and continues to minimize them for ideological reasons.

Myth 2: Nicotine Vaping is Addictive and Dangerous for Non-Smokers

Reality: Addictions are harmful behaviors that people engage in despite the serious consequences they carry. This standard does not apply to nicotine, which many people use for their entire lives without experiencing any ill effects. Smokers are harmed by chronic tobacco use, but that harm isn’t caused by nicotine itself. While the drug “keeps people using tobacco products, it is not what makes tobacco use so deadly,” the FDA has acknowledged elsewhere.

Myth 3: We Need More Studies on the Short-and-Long-Term Health Outcomes of Vaping.

Reality: We have close to 30 years of evidence from millions of people around the globe who have switched from smoking to nicotine vaping. Their experiences have been documented in hundreds of high-quality studies at this point. If the FDA thinks more studies are needed, the agency should explain why instead of implying that there is a serious health risk just waiting to be discovered.

Conclusion

While the FDA continues to wring its hands and speculate about the so-far entirely hypothetical risks of nicotine vaping, hundreds of thousands of Americans continue to die from smoking every year. The agency’s priorities are wildly out of order. Instead of fretting about the much less harmful habit, let’s get as many people as possible to quit the far deadlier one.

Recent Articles

Dr. Macias first fell in love with science while studying at Howard University, where she completed her undergraduate studies and later earned her PhD in cellular and molecular biology. While at Howard, she became especially interested in cancer research due to personal ties. Growing up in a Creole family and predominantly Black community in Louisiana, Dr. Macias watched many women around her battle breast cancer, so at Howard, she decided to focus her research on the BRCA1 gene.
It’s almost amazing that the same institutions that brought us the 2008 financial crisis have a problem with selling glass pipes. Almost. The truth is that an industry's past sins are only held against it when the money isn’t right. Big banks were willing to risk cratering the U.S. housing market because the profits were too good to ignore. But the cannabis industry rolls a different kind of paper, so instead of a slap on the wrist, it gets a surcharge.
Smokeshop and counterculture enthusiasts enjoy discovery as part of the experience. Customers enjoy browsing. When they walk into a shop, they don't simply grab a product and leave. They look for something new. This is the main reason flyers and posters still work. Smokeshops and dispensaries are highly visual environments. You want to see bold artwork, psychedelic graphics, and street-style posters that naturally capture attention.
The use of cannabis in professional sports has always been a controversial subject. While some are firm believers that all substances should be banned from professional sports altogether, most people aren’t thinking about cannabis when they’re discussing performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). In fact, there have been countless cannabis users in the world of professional sports throughout the years; some of whom are more open about their love for the plant than others.
North Carolina might save us all. A new state bill may be the industry’s best option to save itself from demise when new federal cannabinoid bans take effect in November. And it could use your support.
Hemp is often considered for the things that it is not. It is not intoxicating, it is not illegal, and it is not marijuana. However, now we are seeing a focus back to what it can be. The plant is moving into the level of wine and chocolate and becoming a movement and a culture.
It’s been several months since President Donald Trump signed an executive order to reschedule cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III within the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). On paper, the recent executive order, entitled “Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research,” is a huge step in the right direction for cannabis smokers across the country.
For years, we’ve been told that this industry is the Wild West: a place where the only law amounts to whatever the guy with the gun says. But over the last 12 months, state governments have passed a spate of new regulations that promise to swap the relative lawlessness of poor enforcement of vague rules with real law and order.